Back to Projects
JOIN WHATSAPP GROUP
Free PSC MCQ 4 Lakhs+
Please Write a Review
Current Affairs 2018 to 2022
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 1
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 2
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 3
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 4
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 5
Kerala PSC Indian Economy Book Study Materials Page 488
Book's First Page18.16 ndian onom due to a high level of external borrowings. The and reached the highest level of 3.26 per IMF support to fight the crisis came in but with cent of the GDP in 1990–91.33 many macro-economic conditionalities, checking (iii) The fiscal situation of the states was not the fiscal meance being a major one among good either. State governments which them. With the process of economic reforms are primarily responsible for health, which started in 1991–92, the government also education and other social services had announced its commitment to reduce fiscal deficit an aggregate revenue expenditure of 5 per to 3–4 per cent (of GDP) by the mid-1990s (from cent of GDP on these accounts while their the level of about 8 per cent during 1987–90). capital expenditure accounted for 2.5 per This step was among the many measures which cent on social and other sectors.34 The the government started with the objective of states’ expenditure on the social sector stabilising the economy. We may have a look at went down while their interest payments India’s fiscal situation upto the 1990–91 in the had increased during the 1980s.35 following way: As per the experts, the debt situation in the (i) The fiscal deficits of the central states would have been even worse, but for the government, after averaging below 4 per fact that the states, unlike the Centre, did not cent of the GDP till the 1970s started have independent powers to borrow either from climbing up by being 5.77 per cent in the RBI or the market because of the statutory 1980–81, 8.47 per cent in 1986–87 overdraft regulatory scheme.36 Thus, their deficits ending up at 7.85 per cent in 1990–91 have been self-limiting—whenever the states after being above 7 per cent in the second tried to cut down their deficits the care of the half of the 1980s.31 social sector and capital expenditure suffered and development prospects in the states also suffered. (ii) The revenue (i.e., current) expenditure Now the question arises that why the of the government (Centre and states government has not been able to check the combined) increased from 11.8 per cent menace of fiscal deficits even though there has of GDP to 23 per cent between 1960 been a consensus to do so? There are reasons37 and 1990. The revenue receipts of the which can be cited for it: government also went up on an average (i) Political factor: The political lobbies and of 14.6 per cent in 1971–75 to 20 per sectional politics as well as the subsidies cent in 1986–1990. But the gap between revenue receipts and expenditures 33. Handbook of Statistics on the Economy 2002–03, remained negative—financed largely Reserve Bank of India, Table 221 (cited by Tendulkar and Bhavani, Understanding Reforms, p. 74). by domestic borrowings (as a result the 34. Bimal Jalan, India’s Economic Policy, p. 50 interest payments on domestic debt 35. Reserve Bank of India, The Report of Tenth Finance increased from 0.5 to 2.5 per cent of the Commission (New Delhi, Government of India, 1994) GDP during 1975–90.32 The revenue as quoted in imal alan, ndia s conomic olicy, p. 50. deficit went on increasing after 1979–80 36. This scheme has changed now. After the implementation of the suggestions of the 12th Finance Commission states 31. s. D. Tendulkar and T.A. Bavani, Understanding are now allowed to go for market borrowings to take care of Reforms (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2007) their plan expenditures once they have passed and enacted p. 73. their Fiscal Responsibility Acts (FRAs) in consonance with 32. Bimal Jalan, India’s Economic Policy ( New Delhi: the FRBM Act, 2003. Penguin Books, 1992) p. 48. 37. Based on the points raised by Bimal Jalan, p. 49.