Back to Projects
JOIN WHATSAPP GROUP
Free PSC MCQ 4 Lakhs+
Please Write a Review
Current Affairs 2018 to 2022
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 1
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 2
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 3
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 4
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 5
Kerala PSC Indian Economy Book Study Materials Page 395
Book's First Pagee rit ar et in ndia 14.15 cliff 11 in the US had a positive impact on the market (iii) The RBI also relaxed some investment worldwide including in India. Further, reform rules by removing the maturity measures recently initiated by the government restrictions for first time foreign investors have been well received by the markets. on dated G-Secs (earlier a three-year residual maturity was must for first time neW rules for foreign investment foreign investors). But such investments To promote the flow of foreign funds into the will not be allowed in short-term paper economy the RBI, on 24 January, 2013, further like Treasury Bills. liberalised the provisions of investment in India’s (iv) Foreign investors restricted from investing security market— in the ‘money market’ instruments (i) FIIs and long-term investors12 investment —certificates of deposits (CDs) and limit in Government Securities commercial paper (CPs). (G-Secs) enhanced by US $5 billion (to (v) In the total corporate debt limit of US $ 25 billion). $50 billion, a sub-limit of $25 billion (ii) Investment limit in corporate bonds by each for infrastructure and other than the above-given entities enhanced by $5 infrastructure sector bonds has been billion (to $50 billion). fixed. (vi) Rules requiring FIIs to hold infrastructure debt for at least one year has been 11. ‘Fiscal cliff’ is a term used to describe the crisis that abolished. the US government faced at the end of 2012, when the (vii) The qualified foreign investors (QFIs) terms of the Budget Control Act of 2011 were scheduled to go into effect – a combination of—i). expiring tax would continue to be eligible to invest cuts and ii). across-the-board government spending in corporate debt securities (without any cuts scheduled to become effective December 31, 2012. lock-in or residual maturity clause) and he idea ehind the fiscal cliff was that if the federal government allowed these two events to proceed as mutual fund debt schemes, subject to a planned, they would have a detrimental effect on an total overall ceiling of $1 billion (this already shaky economy, perhaps sending it back into an limit of $1 billion shall continue to be official recession as it cut household incomes, increased unemployment rates and undermined consumer and over and above the revised limit of $50 investor confidence As per the conservative estimates billion for investment in corporate debt). by some US experts, it would have meant a tax increase (viii) As a measure of further relaxation, it to the size of which the country had never seen in the last in 60 years]. has been decided to dispense with the ho first use the term is not clear some elieve that condition of one year lock-in period for it was first used y oldman Sachs economist, Alec the limit of $22 billion (comprising the Phillips, while some others credit Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, still others credit Safir h ed, limits of infrastructure bonds of $12 a reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, who in 1989 billion and $10 billion for non-resident used the term while writing a story detailing the state’s investment in IDFs) within the overall education funding. Sources: The contemporary news limit of $25 billion for foreign investment reportings and articles which appeared during the time in The Economist, The Guardian, The New York Times in infrastructure corporate bond. and The Newsweek. (ix) The residual maturity period (at the time 12. ‘Long-term investors’ include SEBI-registered of first purchase) requirement for the ‘sovereign wealth funds’ (SWFs), multilateral agencies, endowment funds, insurance funds, pension funds and entire limit of $22 billion for foreign foreign central banks. investment in the infrastructure sector has