Back to Projects
JOIN WHATSAPP GROUP
Free PSC MCQ 4 Lakhs+
Please Write a Review
Current Affairs 2018 to 2022
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 1
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 2
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 3
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 4
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 5
Kerala PSC Indian History Book Study Materials Page 903
Book's First Pageindications in the Indus script towards linking the ‘official’ Indus language to of other languages. That Dravidian languages were also being spoken in South India at the time is not very certain. It has been suggested that the extension of copper-use and the increase in crop inventory that we can trace after 2000 BC, through the Malwa and Jorwe cultures, into Southern India, marks a migration of Dravidian speakers from the north. Upon arrival there, a small number of Dravidian languages could have supplanted the numerous separate languages of the earlier nomadic pastoralists, as agriculture, crafts and commerce spread over larger areas. This hypothesis, however, is yet to be proved. Austro-Asiatic Family Major Constituents Khasi, spoken in eastern Meghalaya, belongs to the Mon-Khmer branch, being noticeably isolated from its sister languages in Southeast Asia. The Munda branch includes Mundari and Santhali in Jharkhand, Bihar and Orissa. Savara in south Orissa and Korki on the Maharashtra–Madhya Pradesh border, much further to the west, form two distinct small pockets. While the Munda branch is confined to India, the Mon-Khmer branch includes such languages outside India as Vietnamese, Khmer (in Cambodia) and Mon (in Myanmar and Thailand). Migrations and Intermixing On the basis of the distribution of the Austro- Asiatic families, it has been suggested that the original ancestral language was spoken in Southeast Asia, and that as rice cultivation spread from there, after 5000 BC, peasant communities speaking languages derived from it spread out. Incorporating or bypassing local Palaeolithic or Mesolithic hunting communities, they reached Eastern and Central India well before 3000 BC. Such linguistic spread would concur with the hypothesis that the spread of agriculture facilitated replacement of the earlier numerous tongues, by single dominant languages. But, it is not necessary that such spread of language brought an influx of a biologically different strain (‘race’), since those who spoke the Austro-Asiatic dialects must have intermixed with local populations at each stage of their migration. Sino-Tibetan Family Northeast Indian Languages