Back to Projects
JOIN WHATSAPP GROUP
Free PSC MCQ 4 Lakhs+
Please Write a Review
Current Affairs 2018 to 2022
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 1
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 2
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 3
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 4
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 5
Kerala PSC Indian History Book Study Materials Page 899
Book's First Pageset of languages in the far north of India, among which Kashmiri alone is a major literary language. Then, there are Iranic languages, to which Pashto and Baluchi in Pakistan belong. The Nuristani languages, spoken in distant valleys of northwestern Afghanistan and north NWFP, belong neither to the Indo-Aryan nor to the Iranic branch, and have many archaic features. Earliest Known Languages The earliest known languages of the Indo- Aryan and the Iranic families, the Rigvedic and Avestan, were so close that they easily enable philologists to reconstruct a Proto-Aryan (or ‘Proto-Indo- Iranian’) language. The use of ‘Aryan’ as a designation of the Indian and Iranian branches of the Indo-European family is generally accepted; so also the name ‘Indo-Aryan’ for the Indian branch alone. Such use of the name ‘Aryan’ has no racist connotations; but the designation should not be extended to the Indo-European family as a whole, or to any of its other branches. There is, however, no doubt that the Aryan or Indo-Iranian group of languages belongs to the Indo-European family, as one can see from the similarities in many words in ordinary usage, like those for father, mother, daughter, brother, etc. Restructured Vocabulary Continuous research has not only added a large number of languages to the Indo-European family, but also established a sequential order of changes, whereby the older (‘archaic’) forms of words can be distinguished from the later. From such effort, the purely hypothetical vocabulary of the ancestral ‘Proto-Indo-European’ language has been constructed. The restructured vocabulary suggests that those who spoke the ancestral language, practised pastoralism and plough agriculture, were familiar with horses, and had copper, gold and silver. On the whole, such conditions are apparently similar, as established by archaeological finds, to those of a large part of the grasslands from the Ukraine to eastern Kazakhstan before 3000 BC. It is quite possible that the Proto-Indo-European was actually spoken in some part of this land. Hence, attempts made to trace the origin of Proto-Indo-European to India are not going to succeed. Interaction between Hittite and Hurrian Languages The earliest confirmed chronology for the Aryan group of languages, after their branching off from the parent Indo-European stem, is provided by the great Boghazkui archives (Turkey), which are mainly in Hittite, itself an old Indo-European