Back to Projects
JOIN WHATSAPP GROUP
Free PSC MCQ 4 Lakhs+
Please Write a Review
Current Affairs 2018 to 2022
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 1
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 2
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 3
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 4
PYQ 1200 Q/A Part - 5
Kerala PSC Indian History Book Study Materials Page 750
Book's First PageThe above success, however, proved to be the immediate cause of conflict between Harsha and Pulakesin II. Further, the question of overlordship over the Latas, Malwas and Gurjaras seems to have been the long-standing cause of conflict between the two. Hiuen Tsang gives an elaborate description of Harsha’s preparations for this war, but does not talk about its result. However, he gives the impression that Harsha was the aggressor but did not succeed fully in the war. Chalukyan records of Pulakesin’s successors mention the defeat of Harsha by Pulakesin. Ravi Kirti (the court poet of Pulakesin II and the author of the Aihole Inscription) also hints vaguely at Pulake- sin’s victory. But Ravi Kirti’s account as well as the records of Pulakesin’s successors cannot be taken as impartial as none of the contemporary records refer to Pulakesin’s victory over Harsha. So the only thing we can say is that Harsha’s attack was not a complete success, and it resulted in the conclusion of an honourable treaty with Pulakesin, who continued to have his sway over the south. His Other Conquests According to some scholars, Hasha defeated the Pallava ruler, Mahendravarman I, and also some other southern rulers. But in the absence of any direct evidence, we cannot say anything conclusively. But Orissa or the kingdom of Kalinga seems to have been subjugated by Harsha. Thus, Harsha established his hold practically over the whole of north India. Rajasthan, Punjab, UP, Bihar and Orissa were under his direct control but his sphere of influence spread over a much wider area since peripheral states such as Kashmir, Sind, Valabhi and Kamarupa acknowledged his sovereignty. Harsha’s Government Harsha governed his empire on the same lines as the Guptas did, except that his administration had become more feudal and decentralised. It is stated· that Harsha had cavalry numbering over one lakh and 60,000 elephants. This seems to be astonishing because the Mauryas, who ruled over practically the whole of the country, maintained only 30,000 cavalry and 9,000 elephants. Harsha could possess a larger cavalry only if he could mobilise the support of all his feudatories at the time