state or union territory legislatures concerned. Judicial decisions of superior courts like Supreme
      Court and High Courts are important sources of law. Decisions of the Supreme Court are binding
      on all courts within the territory of India. Local customs and conventions which are not against
      statute, morality, etc., are also recognised and taken into account by courts while administering
      justice in certain spheres.
      Enactment of Law
             The Parliament is competent to make laws on matters enumerated in the Union List. State
      legislatures are competent to make laws on matters enumerated in the State List. Parliament
      alone has power to make laws on matters not included in the State List or Concurrent List. On
      matters enumerated in the Concurrent List, laws can be made by both Parliament and the state
      legislature. But in the event of repugnancy, law made by Parliament shall prevail over law made
      by state legislature, to the extent of repugnancy, be void unless the latter law having been
      reserved for consideration of President, has received his assent and in that event shall prevail in
      that state.India_2019_AMAZON: E published on AMAZON
             At the apex of the entire judicial system exists the Supreme Court of India with a High
      Court for each state or group of states and under the High Courts there is a hierarchy of
      subordinate courts. Panchayat Courts also function in some states under various names like
      Nyaya Panchayat, Panchayat Adalat, Gram Kachehri, etc., to decide civil and criminal disputes
      of petty and local nature. Different state laws provide for jurisdiction of these courts.
             The highest court in each district is that of District and Sessions Judge. This district court is
      the principal court of civil jurisdiction and can try all offences including those punishable with
      death. He is the highest judicial authority in a district. Below him, there are courts of civil
      jurisdiction, known in different states as Munsifs, Sub-Judges, Civil Judges and the like.
      Similarly, criminal courts comprise Chief Judicial Magistrate and Judicial Magistrate of First and
      Second class.
      Supreme Court
             During the British regime, the King in Council, or Privy Council as it was generally called,
      was the highest forum to entertain appeals from the judgements and orders passed by the courts
      in India. On enactment of the Judicial Committee Act, 1833, it came to be called the Judicial
      Committee of Privy Council. The decisions of the Judicial Committee used to be couched in
      advisory form, though, in practice, the Crown always accepted its advice, and it was unthinkable
      that its report will not be given effect to. The Privy Council acted as a channel, through which
      English concepts came to be assimilated with Indian laws. It served as a bridge between the
      Indian and the English legal system, over which legal ideas travelled from England to India. It
      was through this body, that the common law of England was introduced in India under the
      British regime, as the base of its legal system. During its career as the highest court of appeals
      from India for the period of about 200 years, Privy Council rendered over 2,500 judgements, and
      till today these judgements constitute the fountain-source of law on many points in India.
             However, there was a rising demand for establishment of Supreme Court in India, since it
      was felt that appeal to the Privy Council was very costly and beyond the means of common man.
      More important was the reason that it detracted from the self respect of the Indian people.